💡 Small Models, Enterprise Budgets - The Inversion Just Started

Featured Tool 📊 (Free Virtual Event)

The gap is widening between AI investments and the value enterprise companies are getting from them.

If your CFO/CTO is asking “what are we getting from all this?” - you need this framework.

On November 19 from 12 - 1 pm EST, join Section CEO Greg Shove as he shares the two proven paths to AI ROI. You’ll leave with his framework for closing the gap.

In one hour, you’ll learn:

• Why 80% of AI deployments fail to show measurable returns

• The two paths that actually work (and how to choose yours)

• A repeatable framework used by leading enterprise teams

Claim Your Free Spot → (Only 65 spots available)

P.S. Greg Shove is a 7x CEO who’s deployed AI across multiple startups. This isn’t theory - it’s what works.

CTO Quick Hits 🎯

🧠 Google's supervised reinforcement learning: small beats big?

📥 MIT Technology Review breaks down how AI actually works

🔥 Sam Altman backs Exowatt's solar-thermal "hot rock" play

🔍 Databricks drops single-function PDF parser? (why?)

💰 Data centers attract more investment capital than oil exploration

⚙️ Brimstone: JavaScript engine rewritten in Rust

🚀 AirOps launches "System of Action" framework

🛰️ Home Assistant 2025.46 ships with satellite integrations

🎁 + 2 other news items and handpicked research papers worth your time

The Big Picture 🖼️

💡 The AI Cost Curve Just Inverted

Google's new supervised reinforcement learning framework lets smaller models tackle reasoning tasks that previously required expensive, large-scale infrastructure.

This isn't about efficiency - it's about who controls the economics of AI deployment. When Google's research team demonstrated how smaller models can match complex reasoning capabilities, they weren't publishing a paper. They were firing a shot across the bow of every vendor charging premium prices for "only our big models can do this" positioning.

💡Interpretability Is the New Lock-In

OpenAI's push for model interpretability isn't altruism - it's strategic differentiation in a market flooding with commodity models.

The companies that can explain why their AI made a decision will win enterprise contracts.

The ones that can't will compete on price. MIT Technology Review's breakdown of how AI systems actually function shows why transparency matters: it's not about ethics, it's about liability and control.

💡 Energy Is Infrastructure's New Chokepoint

Exowatt's solar-thermal play backed by Sam Altman signals where smart money sees the AI bottleneck: not in chips, not in algorithms, but in power. The company's billion-hot-rock strategy for data center energy is betting that renewable energy costs will determine who can afford to run inference at scale.

For infrastructure leaders: your next competitive advantage might not be better models - it might be cheaper electricity.

The companies locking in energy partnerships now will have unit economics competitors can't match in 24 months.

💡 Document Processing Just Became a Wedge.

Databricks launching a single-function PDF parser looks like a feature release.

It's actually a platform play.

By collapsing multi-service pipelines into one function, they're creating dependency on their ecosystem while killing margin for specialized document processing vendors.

This is how platforms expand: solve a workflow pain point so elegantly that migrating away means rebuilding 10 integrations. If your team is still duct-taping together PDF extraction services, you're building on quicksand.

💡 Capital Follows Infrastructure

When investment capital flowing into data centers exceeds oil exploration funding, that's not a tech story - it's a macroeconomic shift.

The smart money is betting that compute capacity, not energy extraction, determines economic winners for the next decade.

💡 Memory Safety Isn't Technical Debt

Brimstone's decision to rewrite a JavaScript engine in Rust reflects a larger bet: memory-safe languages are transitioning from "nice to have" to "required for enterprise."

When the White House starts mandating memory-safe code in government contracts, that's not a policy change - it's a market signal.

If your team is still writing critical systems in C/C++ without a memory-safety migration plan, you're building technical debt that will become a sales blocker, not just an engineering problem.

💡 Growth Infrastructure Is Consolidating

AirOps positioning itself as a "System of Action for Organic Growth" means someone finally connected the dots: growth isn't about tools, it's about orchestration.

The winners in the next market cycle will be platforms that tie together SEO, content, and distribution into single workflows instead of duct-taped integrations.

📈 Trending Research and Tools

traefik/traefik 
(+109 ⭐ per day, 🔷 Go) Link

• Cloud-native application proxy handling dynamic traffic routing to microservices

• Helps teams: Simplifies service mesh management with automatic service discovery and load balancing across container platforms

bobeff/open-source-games 
(+560 ⭐ per day, 🎒 Many) Link

• Curated collection of open-source game projects spanning multiple genres

• Helps teams: Reference architecture for real-time systems, multiplayer infrastructure, and game engine design patterns

milvus-io/milvus 
(+139 ⭐ per day, 🔷 Go) Link

• High-performance vector database optimized for approximate nearest neighbor search at scale

• Helps teams: Powers semantic search, recommendation systems, and RAG applications with billion-scale vector operations

jj-vcs/jj 
(+16 ⭐ per day, 🦀 Rust) Link

• Git-compatible version control system designed for simpler mental model and workflow

• Helps teams: Reduces merge conflict overhead and simplifies repository management for distributed teams

serverless-dns/serverless-dns 
(+10 ⭐ per day, 💛 JavaScript) Link

• DNS resolver running on serverless platforms like Cloudflare Workers and Deno Deploy

• Helps teams: Adds custom DNS filtering and privacy controls without managing infrastructure

The Bottom Line 🔗 

The strategic play this week isn't picking the right AI model - it's understanding which cost curves are inverting and positioning your infrastructure accordingly.

The CTOs treating this as a technical decision will optimize for performance. The ones treating it as a business decision will optimize for leverage.

Hit Reply And Tell Me 💬 

What’s currently the toughest thing on your roadmap?

I read every single reply.

Interested In Advertising with us?

We reach ~40,000+ CTOs and engineering leaders who control budgets and make purchasing decisions.

They don't just read - they implement.

They evaluate vendors, shortlist solutions, and buy.

Your product should be in front of them.

View our media kit + contact us →